Effectiveness of the Telemedical Lifestyle Intervention Program TeLIPro for Improvement of HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized-Controlled Trial in a Real-Life Setting.

The effectiveness of the multimodal Telemedical Lifestyle Intervention Program (TeLIPro) was proven in the advanced stages of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Since its therapeutic potential focusing on telemedical coaching without using a formula diet is unknown, we evaluated improvements in HbA1c, HbA1c normalisation rate, cardiometabolic risk factors, quality-of-life, and eating behaviour in real life. In this randomized-controlled trial, AOK Rhineland/Hamburg insured T2DM patients (n = 1163) were randomized (1:1) into two parallel groups, and 817 received the allocated intervention. In addition to routine care, all participants got scales, step counters, and access to an online portal. The TeLIPro group additionally received equipment for self-monitoring of blood glucose and telemedical coaching. Data were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months of intervention as well as after a 6-month follow-up. The primary endpoint after 12 months was (i) the estimated treatment difference (ETD) in HbA1c change and (ii) the HbA1c normalisation rate in those with diabetes duration < 5 years. The TeLIPro group demonstrated significantly stronger improvements in HbA1c (ETD -0.4% (-0.5; -0.2); p < 0.001), body weight, body-mass-index, quality-of-life, and eating behaviour, especially in T2DM patients with diabetes duration ≥ 5 years (ETD -0.5% (-0.7; -0.3); p < 0.001). The HbA1c normalisation rate did not significantly differ between groups (25% vs. 18%). Continuous addition of TeLIPro to routine care is effective in improving HbA1c and health-related lifestyle in T2DM patients with longer diabetes duration in real life.

[Complementary and Alternative Medicine Offers of Teaching Practices for General Medicine]. / Komplementär- und alternativmedizinische Angebote von Lehrpraxen für Allgemeinmedizin.

OBJECTIVE: Germany's new medical licensure act has increased the importance of general practice in academic medical education. This study gives an overview of complementary and alternative medicine in general teaching practices in Germany and their adherence to evidence-based criteria which is required in order to qualify as a teaching practice. METHODS: After a systematic search for German teaching practices, we assessed their diagnostic and therapeutic offers via their websites. We calculated the various frequencies of treatments and differentiated between evidence-based complementary medicine and alternative medicine with little to no evidence. RESULTS: Of 4102 practices, more than half offered complementary and/or alternative treatment. Most of those were treatments approved of by the German medical association. Alternative medicine was offered by 18.2% of the practices. CONCLUSION: Collective terms and conflicting evidence complicate the classification of treatments. Teaching practices offering non-evidence-based treatment raise the question whether recruitment of additional teaching practices stands at odds with the quality of medical education. Explicit offers of alternative treatment should disqualify a teaching practice as such. Controversial treatment may be taught academically and during residency with a focus on evidence-based guidelines and communication skills in order to prepare young medical practitioners for talks with their patients about the subject.

Vitamin D during treatment for breast cancer - the perspective of active self-help group leaders.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer patients, there is an elevated risk of developing osteoporosis during treatment which should be addressed by optimizing 25(OH) levels. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the prescription, information and physician-patient communication on vitamin D and bone density in Germany. METHODS: We developed a standardized questionnaire concerning bone density measurement, vitamin D (blood level testing, prescription), information and communication regarding vitamin D. The questionnaire was distributed at the annual meeting of all group leaders of the Women's Cancer Support Association to all participants. RESULTS: Overall, 224 participants completed the questionnaire; 77.7% reported having had at least one bone density measurement test. The number was 84.4% in patients treated with aromatase inhibitor and 43.7% reported that their bone density was too low. In total, 51.3% patients reported at least one vitamin D blood test and 45.1% reported that vitamin D had been primarily addressed by a physician. As many as 74.1% of those reporting a test result had a deficiency; 91.6% of those with a low level got a prescription and 28.4% took vitamin D autonomously. CONCLUSIONS: The awareness on risk of osteoporosis, prevention, early diagnosis and treatment are insufficiently addressed in a patient group with high risk of osteoporosis. More attention should be paid to the phenomenon of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in routine care.

Internet Information on Oral Cancer Drugs: a Critical Comparison between Website Providers.

Cancer patients need access to high-quality information, when making decisions about oral cancer drugs. The internet is often used as a source of information published by highly heterogeneous providers. The objective was to evaluate the quality of website providers supplying online information about oral cancer drugs. One hundred websites were analyzed using content-related and formal criteria, selected from three existing evaluation methods used for cancer websites, for medical information (defined by the German Agency for Quality in Medicine), and for the "fact box" tool. A web search by a patient was simulated to identify websites to evaluate. ANOVA was used to assess information provided by non-profit organizations (governmental and non-governmental), online newspapers, for-profit organizations, and private/unknown providers. Content-related quality differences were found between online newspapers and all other categories, with online newspapers ranking significantly lower than for-profit and non-profit websites. As for formal criteria, for-profit providers scored significantly lower than non-profit providers and online newspapers for the aspect of transparency. Internet information on oral cancer drugs published by non-profit organizations constitutes the best available web-based source of information for cancer patients. Health literacy and e-health literacy should be promoted in the public domain to allow patients to reliably apply web-based information. Certification should be required by law to ensure fulfillment of requirements for data reliability and transparency (authorship and funding) before health professionals recommend websites to cancer patients.

Chimpanzees behave prosocially in a group-specific manner.

Chimpanzees act cooperatively in the wild, but whether they afford benefits to others, and whether their tendency to act prosocially varies across communities, is unclear. Here, we show that chimpanzees from neighboring communities provide valuable resources to group members at personal cost, and that the magnitude of their prosocial behavior is group specific. Provided with a resource-donation experiment allowing free (partner) choice, we observed an increase in prosocial acts across the study period in most of the chimpanzees. When group members could profit (test condition), chimpanzees provided resources more frequently and for longer durations than when their acts produced inaccessible resources (control condition). Strikingly, chimpanzees' prosocial behavior was group specific, with more socially tolerant groups acting more prosocially. We conclude that chimpanzees may purposely behave prosocially toward group members, and that the notion of group-specific sociality in nonhuman animals should crucially inform discussions on the evolution of prosocial behavior.

Quality of life, symptoms and dietary habits in oncology outpatients with malnutrition: A cross-sectional study.

Cancer-related malnutrition has a high prevalence, reduces survival and increases side effects. The aim of this study was to assess oncology outpatients and risk of malnutrition. Reported symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients found to be at risk of malnutrition or malnourished were compared to patients without malnutrition. Using a standardized questionnaire, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Quality of Life and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), patients in an outpatient cancer clinic undergoing chemotherapy treatment at a German University Hospital were assessed for nutrition, risk of malnutrition and quality of life. Based on the MNA, 39 (45.9%) patients were categorized as malnourished or at risk for malnutrition. Loss of appetite (n = 37.6%, p < 0.001) and altered taste sensation (n = 30,3%, p < 0.001) were the symptoms most frequently associated with reduced food intake. Patients with risk of malnutrition scored lower on the global health status (n = 48.15%, p = 0.001). Side effects of cancer treatments lead to a higher risk of malnutrition and as a consequence lower QoL. These side effects should be addressed more efficiently in cancer care.

Attitude of cancer patients from online self-help groups towards physical activity.

PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) is important for cancer patients during and after therapy with respect to reducing side effects and improving quality of life. The aim of the study was to examine how physically active German cancer patients are and to identify predictors for PA. In addition, patients were asked about their attitude towards PA. METHODS: A questionnaire was passed on to members of self-help groups. Multiple regression analyses were run to examine possible predictors such as self-efficacy, patient activation, gender, previous PA, therapy status, and age for PA. RESULTS: 62% of the participants followed the official recommendations by the American Cancer Society for weekly aerobic activity. Multiple regression analyses could confirm age as a predictor for total PA. Higher self-efficacy and patient activation were associated with lower disease burden and a more positive attitude towards PA. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the minor knowledge about PA among cancer patients. The examined group showed that there is potential for improvement regarding PA, although the majority had a positive attitude towards PA. Because of the small sample size existing of online self-help group members, results should be taken with caution.

Importance of and Satisfaction with Information about Their Disease in Cancer Patients.

To learn more about information needs and satisfaction with provided information among cancer patients and whether dissatisfaction with information has any association with how therapy decisions are made. An online survey was conducted during March 2015 and January 2016 by the German non-profit patient organization "Das Lebenshaus e.V." among their members with rare solid tumors. A total of 338 records was analyzed. The majority found information on their disease important and was satisfied with the provided information. The participants were less satisfied with the information concerning management of side effects than with other aspects of information (p < .001). Support groups, lectures, and the oncologist were rated as the most helpful sources of information followed by a second opinion and media. Participants who were dissatisfied with the information more often made the decision on the treatment alone by themselves (p < .001). Our results show a high satisfaction with disease-related information among our study participants. Improvements could be made by offering more information on the management of side effects and by giving more information about support groups, reliable websites, and other helpful media.

Not all cancer patients with an interest in CAM are the same. Differences between patients with a CAM interest prior to the cancer diagnosis and those with first-time interest since diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess differences in age, gender, education and personality (Big Five) between cancer patients already interested in CAM prior to the diagnosis and cancer patients only interested in CAM since their diagnosis. DESIGN: 323 members of the support and information platform "Lebenshaus e.V." with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and sarcomas participated in an online survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interest in CAM prior to cancer diagnosis, CAM interest since diagnosis, CAM use and disclosure of CAM use to doctors. RESULTS: 39% were already interested in CAM before the diagnosis and 40.6% were first interested in CAM after their diagnosis. 44.9% stated a current/past CAM use. Female gender and high education were significant predictors for interest in CAM before the diagnosis and general CAM use. The Big Five did not become significant predictors. Predictors were different for patients interested in CAM before the diagnosis and patients only interested since the diagnosis. Sarcoma patients were significantly more likely to be interested in CAM after the diagnosis than patients with GIST. Disclosure of CAM use could not be predicted by sociodemographic variables and personality. CONCLUSION: Known predictors for interest in CAM such as female gender, higher education and younger age do not seem to apply in cancer patients with no prior CAM affinity. This result together with a high CAM prevalence raises the importance of addressing CAM in all cancer patients for a need-oriented treatment and to avoid side effects and interactions with conventional treatment.

Information needs and usage of complementary and alternative medicine in members of a German self-help group for gastrointestinal stroma tumours, sarcoma, and renal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: 40-50% of German cancer patients use some method of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and both patients and doctors often feel insufficiently informed. We examined the information-seeking behaviour and satisfaction with information on patients' interest in CAM and the therapy decision. DESIGN AND SETTING: An anonymous, voluntary online survey was conducted among the members of "Das Lebenshaus e.V." (House of Life), a decentralized support group for patients with gastrointestinal stroma tumours (GIST), sarcoma, and renal cancer. Data was collected from March 2015 until January 2016 using closed questions with multiple choice if appropriate and in case of ranking, a 5-point Likert scale. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations between CAM interest, usage, information needs, sources of information and therapy decision were calculated using chi square tests for univariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 431 patients took part in our survey, thus return rate was 19.6%. 43.9% (n = 189) of the participants were female, 37.1% (n = 160) were male, 19.0% (n = 82) did not respond. Mean age was 59.8 years. The most common tumours were GIST (346%, n = 149), renal cancer (22.3%, n = 96) and sarcoma (20.0%, n = 86). 55.2% (n = 138) of the respondents were patients undergoing treatment, 19.7% (n = 85) were after treatment, 2.6% (n = 11) were relatives and 4.4% (n = 19) others while 18.1% (n = 78) did not respond. A total of 81.8% (n = 337) of the participants were interested in CAM, but only 44.7% (n = 152) used one of the methods. Women were more commonly interested in CAM (87.2%, n = 163) and used it more often: 53.0% (n = 97) vs. 36.2% (n = 55). Information about CAM was considered important by 85.5% (n = 360) and the Internet was the most commonly used source for information about CAM (77.9%, n = 205). However, 61.4% (n = 233) were not satisfied with the information received about CAM, especially from doctors and hospitals. Patients unsatisfied with the information they had formally received about the course of their disease significantly more often used CAM (p = 0.029). Users would also make the therapy decision by themselves more often (p = 0.036). Nearly a fifth did not disclose their use to a doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Dissatisfaction with received information reveals a strong need for scientific information to be available to both patients and doctors. Physicians should get special training about CAM. As the Internet is an important source, high-quality and scientific information should be portrayed on webpages easily accessible to patients.